Using grammatically correct and legible sentences, answer the following statements sensibly and objectively (20 pts each = 5 pts sentence construction, 5 pts creativity/insight, 5 pts objective assessment/recall of the topic concepts, 5 pts evaluative discussion).
1. Provide two criticisms of interest based bargaining. Explain each.
2. Differentiate collective bargaining from interest based bargaining in terms of 1) process, and 2) approach or style.
3. Give short description of the theme of your labor negotiations simulation activity. How did your group accomplish the activity? What were the preparations?
Biyernes, Marso 8, 2013
Labor Law Finals
Using grammatically correct and legible sentences, answer the following statements sensibly and objectively (20 pts each = 5 pts sentence construction, 5 pts creativity/insight, 5 pts objective assessment/recall of the topic concepts, 5 pts evaluative discussion).
1. Explain the social justice of having state insurance fund. How does state insurance fund work?
2. Differentiate various ways of separation from employment in terms of 1) process, and 2) benefits. Why is there difference among these separation from employment?
3. Enumerate the required medical and dental facilities to an employer in a 1) hazardous and 2) non-hazardous workplace. Give situational examples.
1. Explain the social justice of having state insurance fund. How does state insurance fund work?
2. Differentiate various ways of separation from employment in terms of 1) process, and 2) benefits. Why is there difference among these separation from employment?
3. Enumerate the required medical and dental facilities to an employer in a 1) hazardous and 2) non-hazardous workplace. Give situational examples.
Lunes, Marso 4, 2013
Rights of the Accused - List of Case Digests
In a democracy, an accussed person has the privilege of protected rights. It rests on the concept that he or she is merely an accused and not a criminal until guilt has been proven.
PGC students from 1LM3 are tasked to write THEIR individual case digests as pers class instruction.
This list is one of our class academic outcomes which is to create a small archive of jurisprudence relating to constitutional law. Being able to submit required posts merits additional grades for recitations and possible considerations for the final grade.
This activity will also constitute our meeting for wednesday, March 6, 2013, in order to accomodate 1LM3's schedule adjustment for that day.
PGC students from 1LM3 are tasked to write THEIR individual case digests as pers class instruction.
This list is one of our class academic outcomes which is to create a small archive of jurisprudence relating to constitutional law. Being able to submit required posts merits additional grades for recitations and possible considerations for the final grade.
This activity will also constitute our meeting for wednesday, March 6, 2013, in order to accomodate 1LM3's schedule adjustment for that day.
Mag-subscribe sa:
Mga Post (Atom)